For this frozen window, 0xbb73ac854658507224f7a7470bbe6d99d7433c08dc79e5f6e6aa99150759ab8c looks less like a varied wallet than a repeated route tester: 905 eligible transactions between 2026-07-19 13:02:01 and 23:37:41 UTC, with 623 failures (68.8%). Of those failures, 501 stopped at 0x68ccaa…f143fc::d3::rb and 116 at its paired d3::ra function. The pattern resembles automated retrying, but the chain evidence establishes an address, not a person, company, operator, or bot.
Rhythm and persistence
These complete-history figures cover all 905 eligible transactions. The median gap was 11.8 seconds, the 90th-percentile gap 117.8 seconds, and the longest idle period 10 minutes 18 seconds. The busiest minute was 18:08 UTC, with 34 transactions. The longest consecutive failure run was 27.
The failure was not a one-off burst. The sender remained active across the report window and repeatedly reached the same repayment family. A Move abort rolls back application changes, so reaching a flash-loan return call proves an attempted route, not a completed swap or a persisted result.
The complete history also shows a narrow explanatory repertoire. Whole-transaction purpose was established for 49 of 905 rows; 80 received only a partial explanation, 776 were described through their connected calls without a whole-transaction purpose, and 3 never reached execution. Among the 902 rows usable for semantic interpretation, the asserted behaviors were:
- 23
execute-balance-destroy-zerotransactions, 2.55% of 902. - 13
execute-swap-routetransactions, 1.44%. - 8 native-coin consolidations, 0.89%.
- 5 asset transfers, 0.55%.
The remaining 853 semantically usable rows carried no asserted behavior. That absence is a withheld claim, not evidence that nothing happened.
The latest 500 tell the same story
The detailed ledger is a separate, capped scope: the latest 500 semantically usable transactions, from 18:52:49 to 23:37:41 UTC. It contains 348 failures (69.6%): 308 at d3::rb, 37 at d3::ra, and 3 at a linked-pool swap call. It contains 441 call-composition descriptions, 27 partial explanations, and 32 whole-transaction purposes.
The latest stream’s 32 purpose-bearing rows comprise 23 balance-cleanup routes, 6 swap routes, 2 native-coin consolidations, and 1 transfer. Every row in that ledger has boundary movement evidence, although the evidence does not assign every movement to a particular call.
One failed example, [2JXEZMEd](2JXEZMEd), shows the mechanism clearly. It opened short-lived USDC flash credit, passed value through calls touching USDC/CETUS, CETUS/SUI, and SUI/USDC, then attempted the quote-side return d3::rb. It aborted with code 999. The recorded sender movement was -0.000805292 SUI; the detail explicitly says the earlier calls rolled back and that the record does not establish an exchange.
There were committed exceptions. In [9K4CSmHk](9K4CSmHk), the described execute-balance-destroy-zero route opened SUI flash credit, reached a SUI/USDC swap call, handled an empty balance, completed the return sequence, and then transferred a returned coin. The sender-boundary record shows +0.009235334 SUI in holding accounting and -0.005369188 SUI in gas accounting. The transaction detail still withholds an exchange conclusion.
A second committed example, [3zQ2krwL](3zQ2krwL), records +0.054202 USDSUI and -0.006430128 SUI in holding accounting, with -0.006430128 SUI separately recorded as gas. These are boundary movements, not a profit calculation or proof of a particular trade. Across all 13 asserted swap routes in the complete history, 3 did not fail and 10 stopped at d3::rb.
What the sender-boundary movements say
These are complete-history totals, grouped by asset and evidence category. Gas and holding accounting are separate and must not be added together.
- SUI holding: gross in 3.119412041 SUI, gross out 1.383416288 SUI, net +1.735995753 SUI.
- SUI gas: gross in 0.386906752 SUI, gross out 1.529727468 SUI, net -1.142820716 SUI.
- USDC holding: 4.74909 in, 4.99717 out, net -0.24808 USDC.
- DEEP holding: 27.919996 in, 31.935405 out, net -4.015409 DEEP.
- USDSUI holding: 1.223425 in, 0.200768 out, net +1.022657 USDSUI.
- WAL holding: 0.238239614 in, 0.496907322 out, net -0.258667708 WAL.
- XBTC holding: 2,417 raw units in, 48 out, net +2,369.
- XAUM holding: 88,127 raw units in, 41,512 out, net +46,615.
- ALKIMI holding: 83,791,708 raw units in, 575,629,068 out, net -491,837,360.
There are no prices in this corpus, so these figures cannot establish dollar value, cross-asset performance, or profit. The sender paid its own gas in all 905 eligible transactions; no sponsored transaction appears in the complete history.
The stable character is therefore narrow and mechanical: repeated flash-funded call chains, frequent failure at a repayment guard, and occasional committed cleanup or transfer routes. The evidence supports persistent route execution consistent with scripted activity. It does not establish who controlled the address, why the retries continued, or whether any route was economically successful.
Follow the evidence
- Failed route attempt: [
2JXEZMEd](2JXEZMEd) - Committed cleanup route: [
9K4CSmHk](9K4CSmHk) - Committed USDSUI route: [
3zQ2krwL](3zQ2krwL) - Reusable route meaning:
sui/execute-swap-route/roster-f0226/v1 - Cleanup-route meaning:
sui/execute-balance-destroy-zero/roster-f0136/v1 - Dominant repayment revision:
0x68ccaa…f143fc